Discussion papers research
How to write a discussion in a report
Writing the Discussion. If you feel compelled to speculate, be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. Respiratory Care 49 October ; Kretchmer, Paul. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your prior assumptions or biases. Organization and Structure Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Bates College; Hess, Dean R. And which is best? Organization and Structure Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Use of the first person is acceptable, but too much use of the first person may actually distract the reader from the main points. Below, we explain each, pointing out its strengths and weaknesses. Use of the first person pronoun is generally acceptable. Comment on their relative importance in relation to your overall interpretation of the results and, if necessary, note how they may affect the validity of the findings. Note that any significant or unanticipated finding is often because there was no prior research to indicate the finding could occur.
The peer-review and publication process can take months to a year or longer, which means that by the time studies get published, their findings are sometimes not as useful or relevant and the data are old.
Government agencies issue a lot of white papers.
Begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most important finding first. Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective.
If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated.
Avoid using jargon. Analyzing vs.
Do not introduce new results in the discussion section. George Mason University; Discussion. Overall Objectives The objectives of your discussion section should include the following: I.
Discussion section of a research paper example
The Content The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: Explanation of results: comment on whether or not the results were expected for each set of results; go into greater depth to explain findings that were unexpected or especially profound. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated. Begin by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the introduction. The Content The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: Explanation of results: comment on whether or not the results were expected and present explanations for the results; go into greater depth when explaining findings that were unexpected or especially profound. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, One might be ready for publication in a prestigious journal while another requires significant editing and other changes that could actually alter its main findings. Election Assistance Commission authored a white paper on election technology. Interpretation is a subjective exercise. White paper A white paper is generally a report that outlines a complex issue and sometimes also explores possible solutions to a problem. If appropriate, refer the reader to a figure or table to help enhance the interpretation of the data. Moreover, some unanswered questions may have become more focused because of your study. Below, we explain each, pointing out its strengths and weaknesses.
This paragraph should begin with a description of the unexpected finding, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study.
based on 35 review