Explain the restorative justice process
Impact of RJ A multi-site study 8 of victims of crime and criminal justice professionals across Canada found that criminal justice professionals surveyed believed that RJ would be most effective in cases involving: youth in conflict with the law; first-time offenders; minor property offences; where the whole community is affected; where the victim consents to participate; and where the offender is motivated to participate.
Some programs have devoted extensive effort to training, consultation and partnership with appropriate supporting agencies to offer RJ in some of these cases, but that is not the norm.
Although one of the core tenets of restorative justice involves bringing the key participants together to repair the harm caused by the offence, victims and offenders do not always meet face-to-face. These agreements usually state that conference discussions will not be disclosed to nonparticipants. The potential for restorative justice to reduce recidivism is one of the strongest and most promising arguments for its use in prisons. All parties should be a part of the response to the crime, including the victim if he or she wishes, the community, and the juvenile offender. This approach develops and fosters empathy, as participating parties must come to understand the needs of all stakeholders in order for the conflict to be fully rectified. However, the authors caution that a self-selection bias is rife through most studies of restorative justice. The aim is to compare the relative cost-effectiveness and impacts on victim harm and offender recidivism of these two restorative justice models. Much of the diversity in practice and definition is due to the fact that restorative justice theory has developed alongside restorative justice practice. A courtroom process might employ pretrial diversion, dismissing charges after restitution. What is the level of community involvement in the juvenile justice process? If a match for RJ is established by the registry, the victim would be contacted by victim services and the offender would be contacted by offender services and the two types of services would work together collaboratively to explore RJ. If the children help create the rules, then they have ownership.
Such data does not exist. CoSA projects now exist in every Canadian province and every major urban centre.
Restorative justice pros and cons
The programs tend to avoid shaming and stigmatizing the offender. Ninety percent of the time the student did, and the problem ended there. Establish an advisory group on evidence, at arms-length from government, to review evidence. It is also important that specific implementation plans be developed at the grassroots level through a community-based process that engages all stakeholders. If a match for RJ is established by the registry, the victim would be contacted by victim services and the offender would be contacted by offender services and the two types of services would work together collaboratively to explore RJ. Its goal is to establish whether restorative justice can lead to better relations between the police and minority groups. Consequently, it is essential that policy and practice be tested against restorative values on a regular basis. So what does all this look like in a real-world school or classroom? Some agreements specify a larger monetary amount e. If the children help create the rules, then they have ownership. Thus, the Danish story is a tale of how a term was adopted from the international context and gradually gained popularity and increased attention. A recent meta-analysis by the Cochrane Collaboration on the effect of youth justice conferencing on recidivism in young offenders found that there was no significant effect for restorative justice conferencing over normal court procedures for number re-arrested, nor monthly rate of reoffending. Set specific goals based on the information you have gathered. More than this, restorative justice in schools requires a pledge of time and money from the district and its administration.
No doubt, Zehr has been the single most influential author on restorative justice. More than this, restorative justice in schools requires a pledge of time and money from the district and its administration. It clearly provides that, for alternative measures to be deemed appropriate, the needs of the alleged offender must first be considered, along with the interests of a victim and society.
The following is a list of key activities that jurisdictions find necessary for implementing their desired system reforms toward a more balanced and restorative justice model: Identify the stakeholders in the work of juvenile justice.
Restorative justice theory
Institutes and Organizations. Implementing this new approach will be evolutionary, and some practices will look similar on the surface but will be guided by different values. Halbert, L. Achilles, E. Identify the most promising opportunities for change. A courtroom process might employ pretrial diversion, dismissing charges after restitution. Community members hold the offender s accountable for adherence to the plan. There are many different names and procedures of operation for these community-based meetings. Conferences may take on a restorative format, such as a restorative conference that involves the young person, the victim and other members of the community in a discussion about how the young person could be held accountable for an offence by making reparation to the victim. It offers a different response, namely the use of restorative solutions to repair the harm related to conflict, crime, and victimization. In the s, the term began to appear in United Nations and European Union documents, illustrating that restorative justice had become an internationally recognised approach to justice. For restorative justice to work, it requires engagement from all involved parties. All agree. First, it demonstrated that the international history represents a story about a term that became immensely popular and expanded into new areas. Who has a stake in the situation?
What are community perceptions about juvenile justice? Many jurisdictions cap the amount which a juvenile offender can be required to pay.
Sherman, Strang and Newbury-Birch 9 clarify the distinction between restorative practices and restorative justice whereby the former represent approaches to justice, criminal sanctions and rehabilitation that attempt to incorporate either offender awareness of the harm they have caused, or offender efforts to pay back the community for that harm, without necessarily engaging in restorative justice or in any way repairing harm done to their own victims.
To illustrate this, the report presents seven stories with concrete examples of how restorative justice has been practiced in Denmark.
based on 99 review