Top ten percent rule in texas
Only about 9 percent of students who just miss being in the top 10 percent enroll in a flagship. In this study, we examine the effect of being eligible for automatic admission under the Texas Ten Percent Plan.
Published on February 6, at pm Last update on February 6, at pm By Bella McWhorter The Top 10 Percent Rule allows high school seniors in the top 10 percent of their class to receive automatic admission to any Texas public university.
The goal was to find a way to increase the enrollment of black and Latino students after a federal court banned race-based affirmative action in the state.
Should texas continue to use the top 10 percent rule
Texas created the policy in after a federal appellate court ruled, in Hopwood v. Often lost in the debate over these policies is a more basic question: do they benefit the students who receive automatic admissions? As expected, students in the top 10 percent are higher-performing across all measures of academic achievement. Finally, our results cannot speak to the overall effects of instituting the TTP Plan. For instance, it may be that students admitted because of TTP are not able to do well in the rigorous academic environment of the flagship universities. When interpreting these results, it is important to remember that even the higher college-sending high schools in the district have relatively low college-sending rates relative to the state as a whole. In addition, our results are specific to students near the eligibility cutoff. We find that eligibility for automatic admissions under the TTP Plan increases the likelihood that students enroll at a flagship Texas university by at least 60 percent. The challenge we face is that TTP-eligible and -ineligible students are obviously quite different, most importantly in terms of academic performance.
With this in mind though, it seems that the law has produced more problems and concerns, then good benefits. Lastly, the law is unfair for students in smaller and more competitive schools, compared to those in larger schools.
Students from small and rural schools deserve a system that is built for them. Another existing law, which precededprovides a full tuition scholarship for the class valedictorian of a Texas high school for their freshman year at a state public school.
They also point out that students admitted under the legislation performed better in college than their counterparts. In other words, they may not tell us what effect automatic admission would have for students far below or above the 10 percent cutoff. An important question is whether students who are admitted under the TTP Plan drop out of these highly selective schools at a higher rate than other students.
For high school guidance counselors, the researchers say the lesson is that high achieving kids need more support.
Should the state of texas continue to use the top 10 percent rule essay
Nonetheless, because selective institutions generally charge a higher price, tuition provides a general indication of relative school quality. Students must still find the means to pay, and may not achieve their desired choice of major. Supporters of the rule argue that it ensures geographic and ethnic diversity in public universities. The Top Ten Percent Rule is forcing the universities to admit more students just because they are high in class rank, not for what they can bring to the university. For the flagships, the lesson from this study is that the effort to visit remote and unfamiliar high schools can pay off. We find no consistent evidence that TTP effects are different for underrepresented minority students than for other students. As expected, students in the top 10 percent are higher-performing across all measures of academic achievement.
Determining whether these and other unintended consequences of percent plans exist is an important area for future research. Not only has the rule failed to bring students of all races to UT, but it has now been passed down to solve a separate issue that requires its own solution.
based on 85 review